Just came across a new blog.
http://firstnationsdiscussculturaltheft.blogspot.com/There's some very interesting information posted there.
If anyone recalls Kiesha's "Official Statement regarding Native American Issues" that she posted on Dec. 26th (doubt anyone has forgotten it
![Smiley :)](http://newagefraud.org/smf/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
)
She talks about the person that initiated her....a person named "Falling Feathers" and describes him as possibly being from the Flathead Reservation in Montana (for those that don't know...the reservation the Salish people are part of) but not 100% certain.
This blog contains an image capture from Crowther's youtube channel where she left a comment stating that she was "initiated" by a "Sioux".
So once again Crowther's own words coming back to haunt her false claims. I know her followers are following this thread and are actively changing the littlegrandmother.net site, now using the generic initiation by a "Native American elder" and taking away the tribal affiliation. I wonder how they respond to this. Her "official statement" is that she believed Falling Feathers came from Flathead, but previously stated that she was initiated by a "Sioux" (and also for those reading...that's also a red flag...."Sioux" people tend to refer to themselves as Lakota/Dakota/Nakoda) in a direct contradiction to her now "official statement" regarding her initiation.
I realize the current trend among her followers is that how it happened doesn't matter to them, it's the message that counts, but I would also like to remind them that to Salish and Lakota/Dakota/Nakoda peoples....it DOES matter. She could've sent her message without the false claims of "initiation" by a "Native American elder" and nobody would've questioned her....had she been truthful. So ask yourself, what the motivation is for this claim?
![Huh ???](http://newagefraud.org/smf/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
I think amongst your own consciousness you can agree that the message would not have gained the attention it did so quickly had she simply stated that she was an artist/poet from Colorado raised in a Mormon community who wanted to send a message of love for humanity....there's no sense of legitimacy attached to it in regards to the the new age perception of "shamanism" (and it is a perception...keeping in mind that to all of us, perception is reality). The "indigenous" tag is simply a hot item in that perception and you can see for yourself how many people initially....and currently accept her STILL as a "shaman for the Sioux/Salish tribes" when she herself is now backpedalling from that claim. There's even a highly energetic poster on her youtube vids now claiming she's White Buffalo Calf Woman reincarnated.....someone who's apparently completely lost and obviously doesn't understand the story behind WBCW and now completely believes Crowther and WBCW are connected all based on her "indigenous" title.
If the message is so strong and the followers believe it to be "truth".....why the packaging? Why wouldn't you pay attention without the "titles"?
Superdog