Author Topic: Words on women come at a cost to BIA law  (Read 4923 times)

Offline Tsisqua

  • Posts: 281
    • Native American Unity ~ NAU
Words on women come at a cost to BIA law
« on: July 08, 2008, 11:16:30 am »
WASHINGTON - With Sen. Byron Dorgan fuming in the chairman's seat,
BIA top lawman Pat Ragsdale testified to the Senate Indian Affairs
Committee June 19 that BIA law enforcement has limited resources of
both personnel and funding.

They became more limited still following the Feb. 7 initial decision
of Kelly M. Humphrey, administrative judge of the U.S. Merit Systems
Protection Board, according to Leon Glenn. Humphrey found that BIA
Associate Director of the Division of Law Enforcement Brent
LaRocque's ''use of derogatory, gender-specific language,
including 'bitch,' 'stupid bitch,' 'those women' and 'complete waste
of air' in reference to the appellant (Agatha Tsosie), combined with
his expressed intent to abolish the appellant's position if he were
ever given the opportunity, is direct evidence reflecting his
discriminatory intent to take action against the appellant based on
her gender.''

The action taken was to subject Tsosie and Stephanie Pretty Weasel
(whose case the MSPB consolidated with Tsosie's) to ''reduction in
force'' retirements through gender discrimination. ''The agency
cannot show who made the decision to RIF the appellants, much less
that its decision was bona fide i.e., 'for legitimate management
reasons.''

From the testimony among nine witnesses, Humphrey found that in 2002,
LaRocque had more to say: '''From now on, you women are not here to
tell us what to do. You're here so when we tell you what to do you
just do it. Working with you is like working with the Taliban, and
Tsosie is the head of the Taliban.'''

According to a witness Humphrey relied on: ''LaRocque used the
word 'whore' when talking about women and made other negative
comments about women. ... I Humphrey find that LaRocque's denial of
his involvement in the RIF of the appellants is not credible ...
several of the witnesses who testified at the hearing, including
higher level management officials, testified that LaRocque is not a
truthful or trustworthy person, and has lied on numerous occasions.''

LaRocque was the ''No. 3'' man in BIA law enforcement.

Ted Quasula, who retired in 2000 as the BIA director of law
enforcement, said both Tsosie and Pretty Weasel were good people,
though he knew Tsosie better in his time with the bureau.

''Anybody that knows Aggie, well, she's quiet, respectable, hard-
working, professional; all that good stuff.''

Glenn is not impartial. He retired in March as special agent in
charge of a BIA law enforcement district, having heard his
allegations against bureau management substantiated in testimony
before the board on an Office of the Inspector General report, he
said; and he still has issues with alleged damage to his reputation.

But Glenn wrestled successfully with budgetary issues in his division
throughout his last half-dozen years as a BIA special agent in
charge. He estimated the cost of BIA mismanagement in the MSPB
matter, decided Feb. 7, at $1 million. ''I'd say that's probably
ballpark. ... That's probably close.''

The cost includes approximately a year of back pay to Tsosie and
Pretty Weasel; lengthy administrative leave for LaRocque; potential
compensatory damages permitted by the judge; and attorney fees.

LaRocque declined to discuss his future or Humphrey's findings. ''I
can't comment on that. I wish I could.''

He said he would talk with his supervisor about a response. BIA
spokesman Nedra Darling said Ragsdale would not comment on a
personnel matter or costs, in keeping with Interior Department policy
(the BIA is a subordinate agency of Interior).

Quasula said the damage to the bureau's credibility from LaRocque's
alleged gender-specific language, as well as Humphrey's finding that
LaRocque was untrustworthy and had lied, is bad enough without
reference to ''Giglio material,'' U.S. law that requires prosecutors
to provide defendants in a criminal trial with evidence that tends to
impeach government witnesses.

''If it's just some flunky cop doing it, that's one thing. But when
you get the BIA No. 2 or No. 3 doing it, that's a whole different
level.''

http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096417660
« Last Edit: July 08, 2008, 11:18:52 am by Tsisqua »
There are no leaders in Unity