NAFPS Forum

General => Welcome & News => Topic started by: BrownNosed on March 13, 2008, 10:18:58 pm

Title: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: BrownNosed on March 13, 2008, 10:18:58 pm
You said you never called RNS "A TWINKIE CITY" or attacked ravencrow. She posted in his group topic knowing it was him. You come in and announce you are very close and a personal friend of his. I think when you got the e-mail from her after you already said what you did you tried to smooth it out. Here is the original post by her in his topic. Tell me you were not attacking her. Now you post her IP and the name you think is hers. You are putting an innocent person in danger by posting her name and not Raven Crows.

You are really messed up and no one is trying to sensor you but since 911 and all this identity thefts going on the laws and people are not tolerating it.

[Barnaby's note: pointless reposting removed, user banned for ignoring a warning against continuing this childishness. Perhaps incidentally, this user has posted from an IP belonging to a cable company in Massillon, Ohio, home of the fantasist Eric Macuski aka Red Hawk.]
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Moma_porcupine on March 14, 2008, 12:05:59 am
If you do a Google search on Raven crow and the Red Nation Society you can find a Red Nation Society webpage of a person identified as raven crow or knightcrowwatching,

Quote
MySpace.com - RedNationSociety - 27 - Female - From CA to NC ...
Running RNS Myspace is: Raven Crow aka knightcrowwatching It is our hope that Red Nation Society became a welcoming home for those who were like us. ...
profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=174714450 - 188k - Cached - Similar pages

I could then show folks how if they do a search on knightcrowwatching a page comes up describing someone who matches the description of raven crow AKA Knightcrowwatching and gives this persons real name.

Quote
ArtWanted.com |(name removed)| Artwork Portfolio
(name removed). E-mail Artist. Visit Official Website. Add to 'Art Watch'. Promote This Artist NEW! View / Subscribe NEW! ...
www.artwanted.com/knightcrowwatching - 13k - Cached - Similar pages[

People who put their personal information on line shouldn't complain and play the victim when people notice the connections. Some people really need to grow up or arrange adult supervision for themselves if they want to be on line.
-------
edited because this persons real name has been removed from their Artwork portfolio and no longer comes up in a google search
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: TRIBALMOONS@yahoo.com on March 14, 2008, 12:34:07 am
That is what is called........."Pissin' on our legs and telling us it's raining."

Mama I agree with you...If you don't want your business all over the world wide web, then post NOTHING about yourself.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: frederica on March 14, 2008, 12:44:47 am
What I seen in the last couple of days they do a lot of commerical business on the internet.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: LittleOldMan on March 14, 2008, 12:45:04 am
I have a question please.  The sites such as you are mentioning.   Are the people putting them up trying to make money in some way from advertising, self aggrandisement, or what.  I agree with admin.  I also want to commend them for the close watch that they put on this site.  This is to good a place to acquire correct information for it to descend to the level of Indianz or its like. Again thanks  as always I am "LittleOldMan"
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Moma_porcupine on March 14, 2008, 01:25:09 am
I can see none of this makes any sense to someone who hasn't been following all the threads the last couple days.

If people have some reason to want to know the history of what preceded this thread, and why these people came here, the link below to Ravencrows introduction will show the history;

http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1592.0;all (http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1592.0;all)

I guess Brownnosed is a friend of Ravencrow, who ended their registeration a day or so ago. It seems they both came here to pick fights. They weren't posted here for self aggrandizment or making money ...

Nobody here started any of these threads .
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: LittleOldMan on March 14, 2008, 08:53:39 pm
Mama Porcupine:  I tried to reply last night but I hit the wrong key and lost it.  Anyway if I may I would like to offer a comment or two.  When I first read the post referred to I was fighting an abscessed tooth on lorotab and was not really with it.  Thank you for pointing me back to it.  When I reread it again I picked up on the tone  and it seemed to me to be an incendiary one.  I am a fan of the way the administrator controls this site.  He is an active participant not like in other places where the moderator is nowhere to be found most of the time.  This is a new person from whom we have no history.  We are always going to be skeptical of anything that they post until a relationship can be built.  This poster came in full bore assuming that we would listen with the same attention and respect that we give Earth7 for example.  This will not be ever the case the new poster must earn this and that takes time and experience.  Every true Native American who was raised within their culture is taught respect from the cradle up.  We are also taught that when addressing a group of people who we do not know that we must assume that within that group the are a certain number of traditional Elders. Never but never ever should one show disrespect to an Elder.  It is just not done.  When arguing your point the language that you use is all important.  Wise use of which can put your points over much more effectively than a wild harangue.    Comment two.  Some mention was made of the selling of smudge or prayer kits?  Over many years now I have observed that sage and sweet grass  are sold by vendors at the powwows.  Two questions 1. how would some obtain the material if they did not purchase it.  2.  Why are people to whom smudging with sage is not traditional adopting it rather than what the traditions of their tribe dictate?  Why would a Cherokee adopt a Lakota pipe and a plains smudge when the are not traditional to him?  Comments are offered with all due respect thank you for your attention as always I am called "LittleOldMan"
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Defend the Sacred on March 14, 2008, 10:11:07 pm
We are always going to be skeptical of anything that they post until a relationship can be built.

This is very important.

Most of the people who spend a lot of time on the Internet don't get this. And I think most white Americans don't, either. White Americans are very into the cult of youth, and so many of them expect they can talk out their asses and be believed, and even among complete strangers online they expect instant intimacy and acceptance or you're a "hater". It really is a cultural degradation, as generations back, few of our ancestors would have behaved so appallingly. Well, at least those who were not cultural outcasts or racists. The issue of entrenched racism, and the disrespect that causes, can't be left out of the equation.

It took me a bit of getting used to when I first joined here, but I am now very appreciative of this approach, and it's taught me to have a more healthy skepticism when dealing with people on the Internet. Most of the people on the social networking sites who instantly enthuse about how much they love each other... have never met each other. They don't really know each other on anything but the most superficial level, and what they do know is based on self-reporting and constructed public personas. Those types of interactions are almost entirely based on fantasy.

Quote
Two questions 1. how would some obtain the material if they did not purchase it.  2.  Why are people to whom smudging with sage is not traditional adopting it rather than what the traditions of their tribe dictate?


1. I think that for those who live on the land and can grow the herbs, or who have family or friends who do, it's not an issue. I guess it becomes an issue when people are living in more urban environments.

2. I think it's back to the issue of people feeling rootless, of people who have no surviving traditions, or people in ther family/community to help them know better. The smudging with sage thing seems to me to have come into the Nuage groups via Sunbear's Medicine Wheel Gatherings in the 1980s, where  smudging with sage was done by everyone, before every ceremony, even before talks. It was presented as a "universal" practice, so the Nuagers who wanted to either play NDN, or feel like they were doing something "traditional", appropriated it.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Moma_porcupine on March 14, 2008, 11:09:42 pm
I also appreciate the moderators here and what they do. I would imagine it'is not an easy job, encouraging dialog but not letting things get completely derailed. 

I like to think we all try to be objective and fair enough to listen to whatever concerns people have ,  no matter who it is, or what peoples reputations are. If anyone on this message board acted like Ravencrow or Brownnosed did ,  I would respond in the same way.

The extremely bitter accusations these two people made just didn't make any sense, right up to this last accusation against Tsisqua endangering people by revealing their identity.

You ask some good questions about sage and sweetgrass, ( I really like the second one ) and Kathryn probably says it much more briefly than I would . ( believe me this is a good thing )  ;) If I get into that in this thread I might get myself banned... I think I have already filled up the better part  of two threads and worn out a few keyboards debating this.... ( or the worser part depending on your opinion in the matter)

Below is links to the two threads where this came up before;

Sale of sweetgrass and sage
http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=580.0;all (http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=580.0;all)

Who owns Native culture.
http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=412.0;all (http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=412.0;all)

If you read through them and still feel there is some stuff that should be explored further  maybe it would be better to post a reply in one of those threads instead of here?

No doubt I could be easily provoked to say more on the subject...
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: LittleOldMan on March 14, 2008, 11:20:09 pm
Thanks both of you I'll be back on this after I have researched it further. "LOM"
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: LittleOldMan on March 15, 2008, 01:28:45 am
I took a little time to skim over both the previous threads.  After awhile all the verbage gets to flow together somewhat.  Barnaby it is not my intent to hijack this thread if what I post does not belong let me know.  It may be that you believe that it need to be moved if so no problem I am not well versed in that kind of thing your decision.  The Creator made many many tribes and to each he gave their own culture ,medicine , and traditions.  Why I have no idea twas his wish to do so.  I do feel that the trend toward panindianism is wrong in that it goes against what Creator set up to begin with.  I very strongly support the concept that culture should be held as pure and traditional.  That is what is Cherokee should be held as pure from outside corruption as possible.  In other words  a Cherokee has no business doing a Lakota Pipe ceremony or sweat.  Neither does a lakota have any business going to water or at a traditional stomp.  Yes, you could say I am some what of a purest.  That is not to say that if I found myself at a Lokota Ceremony I could not join my prayers with them.  I very much could and would but not at their alter or inside the circle but as a Cherokee my prayer would join theirs.  Air is not a barrier to the Creator His ear hears all does it not.  Does a Baptist take communion from a Catholic Priest NOT. As to Medicine the plant is only a part of it, if it is not correctly prepared and used in the right way(ceremony) it is at best useless and at worst dangerous.  On occasion I carve pipes.  I use traditional materials that my ancestors used,steatite and soapstone.   Because of my friendship with some Lakota I will not carve Catlinite.  It is sacred to them and it is not my place to offend them.  Nuff said.  When I see the ignorant buying sweet grass or sage at a powwow  it's kind of funny it will not help them in their in their ceremony it has no power in itself.   "LOM"
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: frederica on March 15, 2008, 02:08:21 am
I think that is right LOM, I don't believe any medicine,  or ceremony has any power outsiide it's own territory. That's why the real Medicine People don't leave their ground and don't have to adveriize.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: earthw7 on March 15, 2008, 03:23:41 am
This post ended in a good light, thank you LOM, frederica, and Moma
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Freija on March 15, 2008, 10:37:44 am
Sorry, Earth, don´t mean to start something up again. :)
But since the question has been up for discussion over here, it would be interesting to hear your views on this;

If a Native gives, let´s say, sweetgrass to a non-Native is it OK to burn this (which is, obviously, the purpose) or should you politely say "no thanks" ? Or take it but not use it? You tend to get a lot of herbs given to you as a non. And I guess most of us do not want to be impolite, so  we just say "thank you!"

 
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: earthw7 on March 16, 2008, 03:23:59 am
while that is a good question.
it depend on why they are using it??

each of the medicines we use have a reason
and story behind it.
we don't just burn these because we want to

I have seen the abuse of sage and sweetgrass over
the years. I believe that medicine is for the people
but it is how you use it.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Moma_porcupine on March 16, 2008, 04:10:04 am
I have been given things that I didn't know what to do with, or that was more than I needed. I don't know much except some of the basics, but how I understood this was that the Elder that gave this to me knew I would pass the extra on to traditional people who needed this more than I did.

Which is probably how people traditionally obtain these things without buying them. When I get given something I'm not sure what to do with, I just see myself as one link in the chain of it going to where it is needed.  So it isn't just an object that is received, it is a whole chain of caring relationships. I wouldn't be surprised if some sweet grass braids travel with 10 or 20 people before someone decides it is time to use it.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: earthw7 on March 16, 2008, 02:13:40 pm
yes that is true, the process of gathering the sweet grasses is long and hard. one must pick each strand one at a time.  there are prayers done before picking and you can take one in a group. I have spend all day and then the next day braiding the sweet grass.

There is a story that goes with the use of it. One can use it as tea or a smudge it depends what is needed.

sage is pick the same way with a story, we use it as a tea, poutice, or smudge and the reason are totally different.

Cedar is also a tea or smudge and poutice this is only the flat red cedar they have a reason why the are used with the story.

tobacco is also used in the same way, but the uses is a little different we don't make a tea but we use it as a poutice and smudge.

Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Freija on March 16, 2008, 07:36:57 pm
I find that many Natives coming over here - not talking about the exploiters now - leave some medicine behind as a "thank you". Usually it´s given without any "instructions", sometimes we are told to use it for smudging and protection.

I personally felt uncomfortable saying "No thanks" to people who are respected and/or are Elders/elders.  But a friend thought that would be the correct thing to do...so that´s why I asked.

Maybe take it and wait for an opportunity to pass it along?

Thanks for your inputs, Earth and Moma! 
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: NanticokePiney on March 16, 2008, 10:21:03 pm
[Barnaby's note:
this user has posted from an IP belonging to a cable company in Massillon, Ohio, home of the fantasist Eric Macuski aka Red Hawk.]

 No connection there. They hate each other. This user's spouse is Nanticoke and a relative of mine.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Moma_porcupine on December 12, 2008, 04:14:01 am
Stuff from this thread here came up in the thread on Tsisqua below

http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1674.75

Instead of going off topic over there , about something that happened over here I am answering here ...

Reply #92
Ravencrow now posting as gogv
Quote
My name was not of a public record and there is only one way she could get it and it was to buy it. I can see if I had other sites and public things with my name on it, but I did not.

I posted a link to this thread and said

Quote
gogv ... sorry but that isn't true and was already discussed here once

See reply #1

When I saw you removed this information I edited my post and removed your name which was in my report about how easy your real name was to find with a simple google search on your user name. Maybe you forgot about this... ?

Tsisqua did enough stuff that is wrong without any of us blurring the issues by accusing her of stuff she didn't do.

As i just said I am intolerant of people not telling the truth and yeah I know this can be annoying. No offence is meant but i have to tell the truth and I can only support people who do the same.

I agree with your other points and yes Tsisqua was good at creating unnecessary conflict, and bad feelings.

And gogv who was raven crow replied

Reply #94
Quote
Okay I don't see where I posted my Sonja name anywhere and that is what I am talking about. She also posted my IP and I know that too was not public information. When people have social sites those people are expected to hold some respect for people's privacy. In Freewebs they have a program that tracks IP's and that is where Tsisqua got mine. But it is not her right to post it here, there, or everywhere like she did.

Now I do admit I made a mistake with RNS and I did apologize here openly for anything mean I may have said. Now I also know none of my Nicnames show me as Sonja. Now IP's fine it does not take you directly to my house but hey, anyone wants to come and visit I will now map quest it for you. That is what I am talking about. I don't feel I wrongfully accused her of anything because she did do that. She also had a few variations of my name and not all of them was mine. The only way she could of gotten that was in a credit check. I got one myself and I saw some things there that was not even mine so I had that cleared up.

I just googled knightcrowwatching and these are what came up

http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=knightcrowwatching&form=QBRE&custom=1&checkcustom=1&qs=n

and for Ravencrow this came up

http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=ravencrow&form=QBRE&custom=1&checkcustom=1&qs=n

Still nothing with my IP or Sonja name.

But that is okay. I am not all twisted up on that nor does it rule my life. I also don't make a habit of blaming people for something they did not do. I know she did what she did to me and that is not a lie

So here is my response to all that

Ravencrow / gogv first off i don't think the difficulties you had with Tsisqua are because you are lying. Without a doubt she was lying and getting along with a liar is next to impossible.

As for what I am saying about your real name being on line alongside of your internet identity . It was. It isn't any longer. Of course it doesn't come up in a google search anymore . It isn't there anymore .

If you didn't realize this could easily be found on line , I can see why you would be upset when Tsisqua and The Reble began posting this information. But it is not true that this information was not in the public relm and easy to find and I did save screen shots.

When I saw you had removed your real name from the webpage where it appeared alongside your internet user name , ( and you must have realized it was there to remove it ) I edited my post and removed your name . Maybe you just forgot this?

Generally speaking , I agree that posting information like someones real name or IP could lead to someone getting hurt in a way people might not have imagined or intended , and I don't think it's OK to post this information unless there is a very good reason to do so - such as a real concern for pubic safety - or it is easily available and was posted publicly by the person it belongs to. As yours appears to have been .
 
Maybe i just am not using the search right but I don't see where Tsisqua ever posted your IP at least not in NAFPS . But I do see where you and a couple other people posted hers as being in Ireland.

http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1592.0

first post in this thread

RavenCrow
Quote
Now I have done an IP check on NAU and her and it goes to Dubblin Ireland

 As this didn't make a likely fit with what she was claiming I can see that there may be a reason for posting this - especially when it was clear tsisqua was lying about pretty much everything -  But if you want to talk about things tsisqua did that were wrong , ( and there is MANY ) this is probably one of the weaker arguments you could make , as you have done the same thing to her yourself !

 Speaking of wrongdoing...

Rereading this I see some of my comments to you were unkind and unnecesarily rude and I apologize for that. I was feeling frustrated because I honestly did not understand what you were trying to say. On top of that, from what i could understand , some of what you were saying- like that by Tsisqua putting your real name on line in association with your internet ID had endangered you , was just not true , because you had clearly done this yourself .

Ravencrow / gogv I really sympathize with what you went through with this person posting as tsisqua and i know from my own experience that she could be really nasty , but doing battle with someone like this it's really important to present what you are trying to communicate in a way that people can understand what you are saying. If you get the real problems all mixed up with stuff that is more just your own perceptions or you blame someone else for something you did yourself , you just set yourself up to be misunderstood. People like tsisqua will use this to play the victim and make it all your problem. Even when it's not.

I don't mean to be unkind but accusing people of stuff that isn't really true when they have done a lot of things that are truly very wrong , all that does is confuses things. And then you are hurting yourself just as much as someone else has hurt you.

I hope this helps you understand how some of these misunderstandings came about. Maybe i have had  a part in that too- and reading my own rude comments i can see this is the case . For that I sincerely apologize. But I need you to be true to the facts if i am going to be able to be supportive towards you , and it was you that put your name * in the public relm together with your internet name *- and not Tsisqua

I think the title of this thread kind of sums up all the silly accusations that confused the main issues ...

"The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first".....

Does that really matter?

I'm tired ....

( edited to replace the 1/2 sentence in between the two *  * which accidently got deleted before I posted this )
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: gogv on December 14, 2008, 12:28:04 am
I still don't see where I called anyone twinkie city first or last. Nor do I see where I posted my name first. When Tsisqua was her in the past and all the crap was flying she did post my ip. It was withing 24 hours of me first being here. Now if that original post was deleted and it appears it was, what can I say but what I know?

Also you and others that were here then, are fully aware that she did that. Just because some are denying it, does not mean it did not happen. Just because that post was deleted does not mean it was not said. I don't pull things from the air to just have something to complain about.

Of all the things she did that is the one thing I was most pissed about. Recently, the one who brought my name up again was, Zoi. I suspect she did that because she also saw the same post I am talking about and thought she might get a rise out of me. She assumed wrong of course.

I am saying I don't care anymore and I will map quest my house for anyone who wants to visit. This really is all I have to say on this matter. I know the truth of what happened and what was said and really that is all that matters.
Title: Re: The question about who said Twinkie City and who attacked first
Post by: Moma_porcupine on December 14, 2008, 05:00:31 am
gogv

I pmed you the link to the thread in NAFPS and reply number and quote where Tsisqua reposted your real name. Yes Tsisqua did repost what you posted elsewhere on the internet. 

I can't see where she posted your IP here and i don't remember seeing that.
I don't remember everything and I could be wrong.

Tsisqua called RSN Twinkie city first. My point was i don't see how petty stuff like that is all that important.

Beyond that it seems crazy to argue about this. We obviously have different priorities in how we communicate.  Lets drop it.